Federal drug laws produce a labeling issue. When you hear the term "drug trafficker," you might consider Pablo Escobar or Walter White, but the reality is that under federal law, drug traffickers consist of people who purchase pseudo-ephedrine for their methamphetamine dealer; act as intermediary in a series of small deals; and even pick up a luggage for the incorrect friend. Thanks to conspiracy laws, everybody on the totem pole can be subject to the very same extreme mandatory minimum sentences.
To the men and women who drafted our federal drug laws in 1986, this might come as a surprise. According to Sen. Robert Byrd, cosponsor of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986, the factor to connect 5- and ten-year compulsory sentences to drug trafficking was to penalize "the kingpins-- the masterminds who are actually running these operations", and the mid-level dealerships.
Fast forward twenty-five years. Today, nearly everybody founded guilty of a federal drug criminal activity is convicted of "drug trafficking", which usually leads to a minimum of a 5- or ten-year mandatory prison sentence. That's a lot of time in federal prison for many people who are minor parts of drug trade, the vast majority of whom are males and females of color.
This is the system that federal district Judge Mark Bennett sees every day. Judge Bennett sits on the district court in northern Iowa, and he deals with a lot of drug cases., I would have sent out 1,092 of my fellow residents to federal jail for obligatory minimum sentences varying from sixty months to life without the possibility of release.
The numbers can't convey the ridiculous catastrophe of everything. This is how he explains a recent drug trafficking case:
I just recently sentenced a group of more than twenty accused on meth trafficking conspiracy charges. All of them plead guilty. Eighteen were 'tablet smurfers,' as federal prosecutors put it, suggesting their role totaled up to routinely purchasing and delivering cold medicine to meth cookers in exchange for extremely small, low-grade quantities to feed their extreme addictions. The majority of were out of work or underemployed. Numerous were single mothers. They did not offer or straight distribute meth; there were no stockpiles of cash, weapons or counter surveillance equipment. Yet all of them dealt with obligatory minimum sentences of sixty or 120 months.
There is data to recommend that Judge Bennett's experience is not uncharacteristic. In 2007, the U.S. Sentencing Commission assembled substantial data on drug and fracture sentencing. They found that in 2005, the majority of the lowest-level drug- and crack-trafficking offenders-- men and women described as "street-level dealerships", "couriers/mules", and "renter/loader/lookout/ enabler/users"-- got five- or ten-year obligatory jail sentences. This is specifically true for crack-cocaine accused, the majority of whom are black; regardless of the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010, selling a small quantity of crack drug (28 grams) brings the same obligatory minimum sentence-- 5 years-- as offering 500 grams of powder drug.
This is the reality for which proponents of serious federal drug laws need to account. We can not pretend that heavy sentences for ladies like Kemba Smith and men like Jamel Dossie are the fluke mistakes of overboard laws. We should confess that https://www.criminallawyerslasvegas.com/drug-conspiracy-defense-las-vegas/ our sentencing of small players in the drug trade to prison terms implied for the leaders of big drug organizations-- as a common incident, not as an exception. As a result, we unnecessarily send to prison great deals of minor culprits for long periods. Judge Bennett decries the human expenses of these sentences:
If prolonged mandatory minimum sentences for nonviolent drug user really worked, one might be able to rationalize them. There is no proof that they do. I have actually seen how they leave hundreds of thousands of children parent-less and thousands of aging, infirm and passing away moms and dads childless. They damage households and mightily fuel the cycle of poverty and addiction.
Here, again, we have proof that Judge Bennett is best: long necessary sentences are unnecessary for a lot of drug offenders. In 2002 and 2003, Michigan and New York rescinded obligatory sentences for drug wrongdoers and gave judges the power to enforce shorter sentences, probation, or drug treatment.
For years, Judge Bennett has seen a system that does not make sense. He has seen obligatory laws composed for the most major, massive drug dealers applied to the men and females on the lowest rungs of the drug trade, and he has seen it happen a lot. We as soon as imagined that serious necessary sentences would be utilized to handle the leaders of big drug operations. It's time our federal drug laws were fit to the people that they really target.
If you have been charged with a drug related offense and need qualified representation, contact us to discuss your case.
Contact:
Mace Yampolsky & Associates
625 S 6th St.
Las Vegas, NV 89101
(702) 385-9777